Which step is NOT typically part of appealing a disciplinary decision made by a licensing board?

In the context of appealing a disciplinary decision made by a licensing board, discussing the issue informally with board members is not typically part of the formal appeal process. The appeal process is governed by established statutory and procedural rules that are designed to ensure fairness and transparency.

When appealing a decision, individuals generally need to file a formal appeal, which initiates the official review process. This involves submitting required documentation and outlining the grounds for the appeal. Presenting evidence and attending a hearing are also critical steps, as they allow the appellant to support their case and provide an opportunity for both sides to be heard in a structured setting.

Informal discussions, while they may provide some insight or context, do not hold any official weight in the formal appeal process and do not typically lead to a resolution of the appeal. Therefore, this step stands apart from the formal procedures defined by most licensing boards, where strict adherence to process is required to ensure that decisions are made based on the evidence and arguments presented in an official capacity.